Nadia

Today is the fourth anniversary of the death of our unborn daughter, Nadia.  It was a period in our life as a family that was particularly difficult.  My uncle had died a few months before, and my mother would die six weeks later.  One cannot really compare one grief to another, but this death was particularly painful for us.  There is something about the loss of a child that is simply incomparable.  You grieve not only for the loss of life, but also for the loss of the future.  As a father or mother, you sort of map out the future of your child while they are still in the womb.  You know that it isn’t real, but dreaming is a good and godly thing.  You dream about their growing up, interacting with the other brothers and sisters, etc.  You create a picture in your mind of what will be, of what could be.

Except it isn’t.

Really the way that we survived the whole thing is because of the care of our pastor at the time, Rev. John M. Berg.  We did a memorial service, and it was possibly the most comforting thing I’ve ever experienced in my life.  I’ll try and post his sermon here sometime.  I read it every year.

The whole matter also brings to my mind the sadness of our culture views life, even in the church.  A miscarriage is the death of an unborn child.  It is one of the greatest tragedies a family can experience.  Yet for many, there are serious questions on whether this is even a life, far less all of the more spiritual issues involved.

My approach as a pastor is fairly simple.  In the case of the death of an unborn child, we rely on the mercy of God. God is merciful, and He wants to save them all.  We have the example of John the Baptist leaping in his mother’s womb at the greeting of “the mother of my Lord.”  This demonstrates to me that A) Children in the womb can have faith; and that B) God wants to give it to them.

When one of my parishioners loses an unborn child, I try to comfort them with these words and that simple reality.  We don’t know all the answers.  We aren’t universalists.  But we do trust in the great and mighty mercy of God, who sent His only begotten Son into the womb of Mary for us.  I don’t know all the answers.  But I know that God is loving and merciful, and that He longs for His children to be with him.

A Lament for the Lectionary

I love the historic lectionary. The rhythm of the readings, the Psalms and Introits, the use of traditional hymnody that speaks references it directly, it flows in a way that is beautiful, reverent and stirring. It stirs up the faith, just as the historic collects remind us as we prepare for Adventtide.

That is why I am so utterly mystified by confessional Lutheranism today.

As Rev. McCain pointed out to us in a recent survey his offered in connection with Cyberbrethren, there is little uniformity amongst practitioners of the historic lectionary. This is no surprise. Since no major publishing house has really supported it in a couple generations, those of us who use it are left to our own devices to come up with translations and practices that fit our given parishes. I can understand that, but it doesn’t make me happy.

But that’s not the real problem. The real problem as I see it is this:

1. While it is in the hymnal, it isn’t really supported or “resourced” by Concordia Publishing House, beyond the production of the lectionary book for LSB.

2. It isn’t taught or supported in any meaningful way to my knowledge at either seminary. I am very happy to be proven wrong on this.

3. It’s been dropped from the Thrivent Calendar, and I don’t believe it is in the more recent CPH pastor’s calendar either.

4. It is not only not taught or “resourced”, I hear pretty consistent anecdotal evidence that it is specifically disdained by liturgical scholars throughout the synod.

Please don’t get me wrong here. I’m not pointing fingers, trying to start a fight, incite liturgical or lectionary rebellion, or in any other way be difficult. It’s really this simple:

I DON’T GET IT

Why? Is it marketing? Is it money? Is it ecumenism with other churches today? Why is there not only a lack of interest, but a near irrational hostility to this lectionary? What is the deal?

Please. Help me out here. This is truly a mystery to me.

-LL

Lectionary Survey

Below you will find a link to a survey that Concordia Publishing House is conducting regarding the lectionary. I would urge every Lutheran pastor and congregation to fill this out. CPH does a lot of wonderful things for Lutheran congregations, and I would dearly love to see them provide more resources for the one year lectionary. But in order for them to do that, they need to know that we are out there and that we’re interested. Please fill it out.

Thanks!

-LL

Lectionary Survey

Originally posted on HistoricLectionary.com

What to look for in a church

Article below by Philip Yancey points to several things that are worth our consideration. He lists three things to look for in a church:

1. Diversity
2. Unity.
3. Mission

He has some good points that are worth considering. I think I would retool them in the following way:

1. Catholicity
2. Theological Unity
3. Mission

The Church, in order to be the Church, is the place where the Holy Spirit calls, gathers, enlightens and sanctifies. That’s why we have the Church. In order for that to happen, there almost by definition must be a gathering of disparate groups of people from various walks of life. They must be called and gathered BY something (the Word), and then must be called and gathered FOR something. They are called by the Word, and that same Word in turn sends them out to gather more. It is a cycle. When the cycle breaks down, it is usually a sign that there is something wrong with #2.

What do you think? Does Yancey have a point? Does this work with our Lutheran theology?

-LL

Denominational Diagnostics | Christianity Today | A Magazine of Evangelical Conviction: “”

(Via Christianity Today.)